GTOC vs. RSP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GTOC (Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOC is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. GTOC is actively managed, while RSP is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTOC charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

GTOC vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOC achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.72% return.

GTOC

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 1.02%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSP

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 18.70%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOC vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF	1.02%	3.52%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	10.72%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOC and RSP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

GTOC vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 52
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOC vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTOC	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.39	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.03	—

Drawdowns

GTOC vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOC drawdown since its inception was -2.70%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOC and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTOC	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-59.92%	+57.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.85%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-0.79%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-6.64%	+5.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTOC	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69%	11.81%	-8.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.69%	16.20%	-12.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.69%	18.33%	-14.64%

GTOC vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOC has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GTOC vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

GTOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than RSP's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF	4.03%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.52%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTOC and RSP in my portfolio?

GTOC and RSP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GTOC or RSP?

On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTOC or RSP?

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for GTOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTOC or RSP?

GTOC has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 1.52% for RSP.

What is the main difference between GTOC and RSP?

GTOC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while RSP is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for GTOC and 0.20% for RSP.