GTOC vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GTOC (Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOC is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. GTOC is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTOC charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

GTOC vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOC achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.

GTOC

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOC vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF	0.39%	3.52%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOC and QQQM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

GTOC vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOC vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTOC	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.85	+0.42

Drawdowns

GTOC vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOC drawdown since its inception was -2.70%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOC and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTOC	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-35.04%	+32.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-0.20%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-8.25%	+7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTOC	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62%	15.91%	-12.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.62%	22.24%	-18.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.62%	22.12%	-18.50%

GTOC vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOC has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GTOC vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

GTOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF	3.64%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTOC and QQQM in my portfolio?

GTOC and QQQM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GTOC or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTOC or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for GTOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTOC or QQQM?

GTOC has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between GTOC and QQQM?

GTOC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for GTOC and 0.15% for QQQM.