GTOC vs. QQQ
GTOC (Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOC is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. GTOC is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTOC charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
GTOC vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOC achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.95% return.
GTOC
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.01%
GTOC vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF | 1.02% | 3.52% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 15.95% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOC and QQQ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOC vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GTOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQ
GTOC vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTOC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTOC vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOC drawdown since its inception was -2.70%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOC and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -82.97% | +80.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -4.66% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -32.72% | +32.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility
GTOC vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 17.95% | -14.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.69% | 22.69% | -19.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.69% | 22.41% | -18.72% |
GTOC vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOC has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GTOC vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GTOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF | 4.03% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOC and QQQ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for GTOC.
GTOC has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
GTOC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for GTOC and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for GTOC and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer