PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTO vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTO vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GTO has underperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 2.93%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return.


GTO

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.69%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
2.93%

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTO vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTO
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
0.68%7.17%2.63%5.95%-14.77%-0.38%10.86%11.65%-0.26%7.41%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GTO and SPHD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2016

0.10

Over the past year, GTO and SPHD have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GTO vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GTO
SPHD

Technology

24.2%
1.5%

Healthcare

13.6%
5.1%

Financial Services

13.5%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
3.4%

Communication Services

10.8%
8.6%

Industrials

8.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
17.8%

Utilities

2.8%
13.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
20.1%

Energy

2.3%
14.1%

Basic Materials

2.3%

-

Technology

GTO
24.2%
SPHD
1.5%

Healthcare

GTO
13.6%
SPHD
5.1%

Financial Services

GTO
13.5%
SPHD
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GTO
12.5%
SPHD
3.4%

Communication Services

GTO
10.8%
SPHD
8.6%

Industrials

GTO
8.8%
SPHD
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

GTO
7.0%
SPHD
17.8%

Utilities

GTO
2.8%
SPHD
13.7%

Real Estate

GTO
2.4%
SPHD
20.1%

Energy

GTO
2.3%
SPHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

GTO
2.3%
SPHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTO vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTO
GTO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTO vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTOSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.11

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

2.78

+4.72

GTO vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTO and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTOSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

0.74

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.39

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.40

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Drawdowns

GTO vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.61%

-41.39%

+20.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-7.33%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-13.29%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-19.50%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.61%

-41.39%

+20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-5.37%

+3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-4.70%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

2.93%

-2.07%

Volatility

GTO vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 1.19%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

2.99%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

7.55%

-5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

11.04%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

14.16%

-8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.58%

17.64%

-12.06%

GTO vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTO vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTO
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
4.76%4.70%4.42%4.05%3.47%1.93%4.04%2.97%5.25%2.81%2.57%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTO and SPHD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHD has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to GTO (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, SPHD leads with 7.08% vs 2.93% for GTO. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, GTO has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 7.08% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTO.

GTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.62% for SPHD.

GTO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while SPHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.30% for SPHD.

GTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTO and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer