GTO vs. APCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) and APCB (ActivePassive Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTO returned 4.86%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for APCB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for APCB.

Performance

GTO vs. APCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than APCB's 0.29% return.

GTO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

APCB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 4.82%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTO vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	0.68%	7.17%	2.63%	2.65%
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	0.29%	6.87%	1.45%	1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GTO and APCB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	0.95

The correlation between GTO and APCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

GTO vs. APCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GTO	APCB
Technology	24.2%	100.0%
Healthcare	13.6%	-
Financial Services	13.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	-
Communication Services	10.8%	-
Industrials	8.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Energy	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.3%	-

Return for Risk

GTO vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTO

GTO Risk / Return Rank: 53
GTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GTO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GTO Martin Ratio Rank: 46

APCB

APCB Risk / Return Rank: 39
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTO vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTO	APCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.41	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.08	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	1.87	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	5.64	+1.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTO vs. APCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the APCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTO and APCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTO	APCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	1.41	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.68	-0.16

Drawdowns

GTO vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, which is greater than APCB's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and APCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTO	APCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.61%	-6.42%	-14.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.73%	-2.58%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.98%	-5.32%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-1.41%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-1.51%	-3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.86%	0.00%

Volatility

GTO vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) have volatilities of 1.19% and 1.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTO	APCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	1.22%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	2.42%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43%	3.43%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.68%	4.84%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.58%	4.84%	+0.74%

GTO vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than APCB's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTO vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison

GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than APCB's 4.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	4.35%	4.35%	4.74%	2.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	4.76%	4.70%	4.42%	4.05%	3.47%	1.93%	4.04%	2.97%	5.25%	2.81%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTO and APCB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GTO and APCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GTO or APCB?

APCB has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to GTO (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs APCB's -6.42%.

Which ETF is better, GTO or APCB?

On 3-year performance, GTO leads with 4.86% vs 3.96% for APCB. On fees, GTO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTO or APCB?

Over the 3-year period, GTO has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTO or APCB?

GTO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for APCB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTO or APCB?

GTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.35% for APCB.

What is the main difference between GTO and APCB?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ActivePassive. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.36% for APCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.