APCB vs. ESGB
APCB (ActivePassive Core Bond ETF) and ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APCB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ESGB.
Performance
APCB vs. ESGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APCB
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APCB vs. ESGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | -0.36% |
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between APCB and ESGB is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APCB vs. ESGB — Risk / Return Rank
APCB
ESGB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
APCB vs. ESGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APCB | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APCB vs. ESGB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APCB | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility
APCB vs. ESGB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APCB | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | — | — |
APCB vs. ESGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
APCB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
APCB vs. ESGB - Dividend Comparison
APCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, while ESGB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 4.39% | 4.35% | 4.74% | 2.22% |
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APCB and ESGB have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APCB is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APCB is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESGB.
APCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 0.00% for ESGB.
They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APCB and 0.39% for ESGB.
Find the right allocation for APCB and ESGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer