APCB vs. ESGB
APCB (ActivePassive Core Bond ETF) and ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APCB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ESGB.
Performance
APCB vs. ESGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
APCB
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APCB vs. ESGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 0.31% |
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between APCB and ESGB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APCB vs. ESGB — Risk / Return Rank
APCB
ESGB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
APCB vs. ESGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APCB | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APCB vs. ESGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APCB drawdown since its inception was -6.42%, which is greater than ESGB's maximum drawdown of -0.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APCB and ESGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APCB | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -0.64% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.39% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -0.38% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
APCB vs. ESGB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APCB | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41% | 4.10% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 4.10% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 4.10% | +0.72% |
APCB vs. ESGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
APCB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
APCB vs. ESGB - Dividend Comparison
APCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, while ESGB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.35% | 4.74% | 2.22% |
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APCB and ESGB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APCB is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APCB is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESGB.
APCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.00% for ESGB.
They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APCB and 0.39% for ESGB.
Find the right allocation for APCB and ESGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer