GTND vs. WAMA
GTND (Goaltender ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GTND is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTND charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
GTND vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTND
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTND vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | -0.05% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTND and WAMA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTND vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTND vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum WAMA drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTND | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -5.73% | +0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.28% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -1.46% | -0.37% |
Volatility
GTND vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTND | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 13.94% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 13.94% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 13.94% | +4.79% |
GTND vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTND vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than WAMA's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | 0.16% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GTND and WAMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GTND.
WAMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.16% for GTND.
They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for GTND and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer