GTND vs. RHRX
GTND (Goaltender ETF) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTND charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.
Performance
GTND vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTND
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHRX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 16.59%
- YTD
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 30.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTND vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | -0.05% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTND and RHRX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTND vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank
GTND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHRX
GTND vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTND | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTND vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and RHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTND | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -25.33% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -3.45% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -8.82% | +6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility
GTND vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTND | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 14.20% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 19.07% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 19.07% | -0.34% |
GTND vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTND vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison
GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | 0.16% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GTND and RHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GTND is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GTND is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.
GTND has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.
They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 1.36% for RHRX.
Find the right allocation for GTND and RHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer