PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTLOX vs. VSMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than VSMPX's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLOX has underperformed VSMPX with an annualized return of 12.70%, while VSMPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


GTLOX

1D
1.39%
1M
9.29%
YTD
22.45%
6M
24.47%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.70%

VSMPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.88%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.45%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%-7.97%24.78%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.15%23.26%26.53%-19.50%25.74%21.01%30.79%-5.16%21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLOX and VSMPX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.94

The correlation between GTLOX and VSMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTLOX vs. VSMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMPX
VSMPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTLOXVSMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.44

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.88

3.38

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.30

15.59

+9.71

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the VSMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLOX and VSMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTLOXVSMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17

2.47

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.76

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.83

-0.32

Drawdowns

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, which is greater than VSMPX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and VSMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTLOXVSMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.09%

-34.97%

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-8.92%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-19.36%

-13.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-25.35%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

-34.97%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-4.59%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.93%

-0.20%

Volatility

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) at 2.95%. This indicates that GTLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTLOXVSMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.95%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

9.19%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

12.19%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

17.36%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

18.41%

+2.50%

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTLOX vs. VSMPX - Dividend Comparison

GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.62%, more than VSMPX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.62%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.02%1.13%1.27%1.43%1.67%1.22%1.43%1.78%2.05%1.73%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTLOX and VSMPX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to VSMPX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLOX dropped -54.09% vs VSMPX's -34.97%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTLOX and VSMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer