PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTLOX vs. SSAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a 22.20% return, which is significantly higher than SSAQX's 6.01% return.


GTLOX

1D
0.84%
1M
4.47%
YTD
22.20%
6M
21.09%
1Y
42.25%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
12.98%

SSAQX

1D
-0.80%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
6.01%
6M
5.24%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.20%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%9.40%
SSAQX
State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund
6.01%17.43%5.04%28.87%-18.27%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLOX and SSAQX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2021

0.87

The correlation between GTLOX and SSAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTLOX vs. SSAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SSAQX
SSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTLOXSSAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.33

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.85

2.15

+3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.67

9.06

+15.61

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the SSAQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLOX and SSAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, which is greater than SSAQX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and SSAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTLOXSSAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.09%

-31.70%

-22.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-10.74%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-31.70%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-31.70%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-1.93%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-8.01%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.54%

-0.78%

Volatility

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) at 4.70%. This indicates that GTLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTLOXSSAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

4.70%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

10.06%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

12.64%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

18.95%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

18.86%

+2.11%

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAQX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Dividend Comparison

GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.65%, more than SSAQX's 11.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.65%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%
SSAQX
State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund
11.34%12.02%0.00%3.83%9.83%13.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTLOX and SSAQX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLOX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to SSAQX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLOX dropped -54.09% vs SSAQX's -31.70%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTLOX and SSAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer