GTLOX vs. SSAQX
GTLOX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio) and SSAQX (State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GTLOX returned 10.80%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for SSAQX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GTLOX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for SSAQX.
Performance
GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTLOX achieves a 22.07% return, which is significantly higher than SSAQX's 9.52% return.
GTLOX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- YTD
- 22.07%
- 1Y
- 37.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.34%
SSAQX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 18.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio | 22.07% | 14.39% | 13.86% | 16.66% | -15.37% | 9.40% |
SSAQX State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund | 9.52% | 17.43% | 5.04% | 28.87% | -18.27% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTLOX and SSAQX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between GTLOX and SSAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTLOX vs. SSAQX — Risk / Return Rank
GTLOX
SSAQX
GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) and State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTLOX | SSAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.27 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.38 | 1.86 | +3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.75 | 7.65 | +14.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTLOX drawdown since its inception was -54.09%, which is greater than SSAQX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLOX and SSAQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTLOX | SSAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.09% | -31.70% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -10.74% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.85% | -31.70% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -31.70% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | 0.00% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -7.87% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.61% | -0.76% |
Volatility
GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) is 3.27%, while State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that GTLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTLOX | SSAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 4.26% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 10.48% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 13.09% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 18.99% | +2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 18.76% | +2.16% |
GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTLOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAQX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTLOX vs. SSAQX - Dividend Comparison
GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.60%, more than SSAQX's 10.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio | 14.60% | 17.84% | 25.96% | 8.32% | 23.58% | 13.35% | 9.06% | 5.35% | 10.53% | 4.99% | 1.08% | 2.09% |
SSAQX State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund | 10.97% | 12.02% | 0.00% | 3.83% | 9.83% | 13.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTLOX and SSAQX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSAQX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to GTLOX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLOX dropped -54.09% vs SSAQX's -31.70%.
GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTLOX and SSAQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer