SSAQX vs. FDGFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSAQX (State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund) and FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SSAQX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by State Street, while FDGFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, SSAQX returned 9.49%/yr vs 16.05%/yr for FDGFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSAQX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDGFX.

Performance

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAQX achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's 17.51% return.

SSAQX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 8.01%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 25.69%
• 3Y*: 14.89%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: —

FDGFX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 5.10%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 19.03%
• 1Y: 39.07%
• 3Y*: 27.43%
• 5Y*: 16.05%
• 10Y*: 14.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SSAQX State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund	8.01%	17.43%	5.04%	28.87%	-18.27%	12.02%
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	17.51%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAQX and FDGFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021	0.93

The correlation between SSAQX and FDGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSAQX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSAQX

SSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 51
SSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSAQX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.98	-0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.97	-0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.53	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	3.96	-1.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.62	17.79	-7.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAQX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSAQX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.98	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.97	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.53	-0.03

Drawdowns

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAQX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAQX and FDGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSAQX	FDGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-60.77%	+29.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.74%	-10.16%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.70%	-21.37%	-10.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.70%	-21.37%	-10.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.08%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.08%	-7.52%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	2.26%	+0.23%

Volatility

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund (SSAQX) is 3.04%, while Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that SSAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSAQX	FDGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	4.03%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	10.59%	-1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	13.48%	-1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.86%	16.59%	+2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.86%	19.22%	-0.36%

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSAQX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSAQX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

SSAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than FDGFX's 8.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.12%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%
SSAQX State Street U.S. Core Equity Fund	11.13%	12.02%	0.00%	3.83%	9.83%	13.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSAQX and FDGFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SSAQX and FDGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SSAQX or FDGFX?

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to SSAQX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSAQX dropped -31.70% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.