GTFBX vs. NMTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX).
GTFBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Mar 30, 1993. NMTRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
GTFBX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTFBX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTFBX T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund | 0.06% | 6.52% | 2.48% | 8.40% | -11.12% | 2.56% | 4.77% | 6.87% | 0.55% | 4.73% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | -0.12% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 1.06% | 7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTFBX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than NMTRX's -0.12% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: GTFBX at 2.27% and NMTRX at 2.27%.
GTFBX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTFBX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTFBX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTFBX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
GTFBX
NMTRX
GTFBX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTFBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 0.84 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.16 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 0.99 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 2.89 | +2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTFBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.84 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.10 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.52 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTFBX and NMTRX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTFBX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
GTFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than NMTRX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTFBX T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund | 6.54% | 6.11% | 3.28% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 2.10% | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.91% | 2.94% | 3.01% | 3.22% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.19% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
GTFBX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTFBX drawdown since its inception was -15.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NMTRX drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTFBX and NMTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTFBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.79% | -16.36% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -4.75% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -16.36% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.79% | -16.36% | +0.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -2.25% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -2.93% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 1.62% | -0.23% |
Volatility
GTFBX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) at 1.07%. This indicates that GTFBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTFBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 1.07% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.04% | 1.82% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.29% | 4.93% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 3.97% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 4.38% | -0.22% |