GTEK vs. XLSI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) and XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while XLSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GTEK returned 54.17% vs 6.59% for XLSI. Their -0.23 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GTEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLSI.

Performance

GTEK vs. XLSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 34.87% return, which is significantly higher than XLSI's 6.67% return.

GTEK

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: -9.56%
• 6M: 29.82%
• YTD: 34.87%
• 1Y: 54.17%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.22%

XLSI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.55%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	$2.28M	$1.64M	$1.45M
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$285.83K	$265.98K	$245.15K

GTEK vs. XLSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	34.87%	10.27%
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	6.67%	-1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and XLSI is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	-0.23

GTEK vs. XLSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GTEK	XLSI
Technology	70.8%	-
Industrials	8.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	1.8%
Communication Services	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Real Estate	3.4%	-
Financial Services	1.2%	100.0%
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	98.2%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GTEK vs. XLSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 72
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 65
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 80

XLSI

XLSI Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XLSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XLSI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XLSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
XLSI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTEK vs. XLSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTEK	XLSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	0.64	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	0.98	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.12	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	0.91	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.41	1.87	+8.54

GTEK vs. XLSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTEK Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the XLSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTEK and XLSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. XLSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than XLSI's maximum drawdown of -7.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and XLSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTEK	XLSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.77%	-7.87%	-45.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.64%	-7.87%	-11.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.28%	-1.93%	-12.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.84%	-3.20%	-23.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	3.82%	+1.09%

Volatility

GTEK vs. XLSI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a higher volatility of 12.14% compared to Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) at 4.23%. This indicates that GTEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTEK	XLSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.14%	4.23%	+7.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.35%	8.87%	+18.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.18%	11.17%	+20.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.98%	11.17%	+17.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.98%	11.17%	+17.81%

GTEK vs. XLSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLSI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTEK vs. XLSI - Dividend Comparison

GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.89%	5.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTEK and XLSI in my portfolio?

GTEK and XLSI have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTEK or XLSI?

GTEK has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to XLSI (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs XLSI's -7.87%.

Which ETF is better, GTEK or XLSI?

On 1-year performance, GTEK leads with 54.17% vs 6.59% for XLSI. On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTEK or XLSI?

Over the 1-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 54.17% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTEK or XLSI?

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTEK or XLSI?

XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between GTEK and XLSI?

GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLSI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.35% for XLSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.