GTBIF vs. CURLF
GTBIF (Green Thumb Industries Inc) and CURLF (Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, GTBIF returned -23.25%/yr vs -24.70%/yr for CURLF. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTBIF achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than CURLF's 42.46% return.
GTBIF
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 25.90%
- 1Y
- 48.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- -23.25%
- 10Y*
- 84.66%
CURLF
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 42.46%
- 6M
- 54.08%
- 1Y
- 333.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.19%
- 5Y*
- -24.70%
- 10Y*
- —
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTBIF Green Thumb Industries Inc | -0.20% | -1.64% | -27.64% | 30.67% | -61.01% | -9.55% | 151.28% | 21.42% | -27.00% |
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. | 42.46% | 61.54% | -61.58% | -5.52% | -52.25% | -24.82% | 89.73% | 33.12% | -18.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTBIF and CURLF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between GTBIF and CURLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GTBIF:
$1.86B
CURLF:
$2.78B
GTBIF:
$0.52
CURLF:
-$0.13
GTBIF:
1.57
CURLF:
2.12
GTBIF:
0.98
CURLF:
3.38
GTBIF:
$1.20B
CURLF:
$1.30B
GTBIF:
$575.26M
CURLF:
$528.91M
GTBIF:
$438.97M
CURLF:
$188.46M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTBIF vs. CURLF — Risk / Return Rank
GTBIF
CURLF
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTBIF | CURLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 2.63 | -2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 3.09 | -1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 5.56 | -4.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | 10.47 | -7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTBIF | CURLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.63 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | -0.28 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -0.07 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTBIF drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, roughly equal to the maximum CURLF drawdown of -95.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTBIF and CURLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTBIF | CURLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -95.70% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.24% | -59.79% | +17.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.66% | -88.28% | +19.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.71% | -95.06% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.14% | -79.01% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.99% | -58.25% | -20.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.45% | 31.77% | -10.32% |
Volatility
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF) is 15.17%, while Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a volatility of 25.73%. This indicates that GTBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTBIF | CURLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.17% | 25.73% | -10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.64% | 87.03% | -17.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.46% | 128.02% | -31.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.81% | 87.93% | -16.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46,691.27% | 84.26% | +46,607.01% |
Dividends
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Dividend Comparison
Neither GTBIF nor CURLF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Green Thumb Industries Inc and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GTBIF vs. CURLF - Profitability Comparison
GTBIF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a gross profit of 143.65M and revenue of 300.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.9%.
CURLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.91M and revenue of 319.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.
GTBIF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported an operating income of 40.73M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.
CURLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 742.57K and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
GTBIF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a net income of 15.40M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
CURLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 68.83M and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTBIF and CURLF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CURLF has higher volatility (25.73%) compared to GTBIF (15.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTBIF dropped -99.97% vs CURLF's -95.70%.
CURLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTBIF and CURLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer