PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTBIF vs. TCNNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF) and Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTBIF achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than TCNNF's 7.25% return.


GTBIF

1D
-2.55%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
25.90%
1Y
48.52%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
-23.25%
10Y*
84.66%

TCNNF

1D
-1.58%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
7.25%
6M
54.56%
1Y
127.32%
3Y*
34.04%
5Y*
-24.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GTBIF
Green Thumb Industries Inc
-0.20%-1.64%-27.64%30.67%-61.01%-9.55%151.28%21.42%-55.34%
TCNNF
Trulieve Cannabis Corp
7.25%67.65%-0.51%-31.18%-70.90%-17.74%167.07%46.53%-23.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GTBIF and TCNNF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.68

The correlation between GTBIF and TCNNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GTBIF:

$1.86B

TCNNF:

$1.84B

EPS

GTBIF:

$0.52

TCNNF:

-$0.42

PS Ratio

GTBIF:

1.57

TCNNF:

1.53

PB Ratio

GTBIF:

0.98

TCNNF:

1.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTBIF:

$1.20B

TCNNF:

$1.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTBIF:

$575.26M

TCNNF:

$670.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

GTBIF:

$438.97M

TCNNF:

$276.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTBIF vs. TCNNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTBIF
GTBIF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GTBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GTBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TCNNF
TCNNF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TCNNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCNNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCNNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TCNNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCNNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF) and Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTBIFTCNNFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

1.06

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

2.42

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.44

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.47

4.87

-2.40

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTBIF Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the TCNNF Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTBIF and TCNNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTBIFTCNNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.06

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

-0.28

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.02

+0.02

Drawdowns

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTBIF drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than TCNNF's maximum drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTBIF and TCNNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTBIFTCNNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-93.88%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.24%

-54.42%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.66%

-77.52%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.71%

-91.77%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.14%

-82.34%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-61.16%

-17.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.45%

27.32%

-5.87%

Volatility

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF) is 15.17%, while Trulieve Cannabis Corp (TCNNF) has a volatility of 28.20%. This indicates that GTBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCNNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTBIFTCNNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.17%

28.20%

-13.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.64%

84.17%

-14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.46%

120.44%

-23.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.81%

87.73%

-15.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46,691.27%

81.80%

+46,609.47%

Dividends

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTBIF nor TCNNF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Green Thumb Industries Inc and Trulieve Cannabis Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M220.00M240.00M260.00M280.00M300.00M320.00M20222023202420252026
300.19M
286.75M
(GTBIF) Total Revenue
(TCNNF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GTBIF vs. TCNNF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Green Thumb Industries Inc and Trulieve Cannabis Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
47.9%
59.3%
Portfolio components
GTBIF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a gross profit of 143.65M and revenue of 300.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.9%.

TCNNF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trulieve Cannabis Corp reported a gross profit of 170.08M and revenue of 286.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

GTBIF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported an operating income of 40.73M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

TCNNF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trulieve Cannabis Corp reported an operating income of 35.73M and revenue of 286.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

GTBIF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a net income of 15.40M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

TCNNF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trulieve Cannabis Corp reported a net income of 2.41M and revenue of 286.75M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GTBIF and TCNNF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCNNF has higher volatility (28.20%) compared to GTBIF (15.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTBIF dropped -99.97% vs TCNNF's -93.88%.

TCNNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTBIF and TCNNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer