GSWO vs. BDVL

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GSWO (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GSWO tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net while BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSWO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.

Performance

GSWO vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSWO achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 6.70% return.

GSWO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: 9.36%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: 17.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.38%

BDVL

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: 4.88%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	$4.62M	$5.40M	$7.08M
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF	$3.19M	$3.35M	$3.82M

GSWO vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF	11.27%	2.00%
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	6.70%	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GSWO and BDVL is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

GSWO vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSWO

GSWO Risk / Return Rank: 68
GSWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
GSWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GSWO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GSWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
GSWO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSWO vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSWO	BDVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	—	—

Drawdowns

GSWO vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSWO drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSWO and BDVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSWO	BDVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.77%	-7.71%	-10.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	0.00%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-1.13%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSWO	BDVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	9.44%	+2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.04%	9.44%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.04%	9.44%	+3.60%

GSWO vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSWO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSWO vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

GSWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than BDVL's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	3.49%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF	1.53%	1.74%	1.75%	2.06%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSWO and BDVL in my portfolio?

GSWO and BDVL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSWO or BDVL?

On fees, GSWO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSWO or BDVL?

GSWO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSWO or BDVL?

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.53% for GSWO.

What is the main difference between GSWO and BDVL?

GSWO tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSWO and 0.40% for BDVL.