GSUS vs. SPY
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.20%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for SPY. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
GSUS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSUS having a 9.54% return and SPY slightly higher at 9.74%.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
GSUS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 9.54% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 32.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and SPY is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between GSUS and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
SPY
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GSUS
SPY
Communication Services
GSUS
SPY
Financial Services
GSUS
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
SPY
Healthcare
GSUS
SPY
Industrials
GSUS
SPY
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
SPY
Energy
GSUS
SPY
Utilities
GSUS
SPY
Basic Materials
GSUS
SPY
Real Estate
GSUS
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
SPY
GSUS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.01 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 13.54 | -0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -55.19% | +29.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -8.88% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -18.76% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -24.50% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -1.75% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -9.04% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.97% | +0.13% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.64% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 9.75% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 12.43% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 17.14% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 17.99% | -0.90% |
GSUS vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, GSUS and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSUS has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.51% vs 13.20% for GSUS. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.99% for GSUS.
GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer