GSUS vs. CGUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS).
GSUS and CGUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. CGUS is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.
Performance
GSUS vs. CGUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSUS vs. CGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | -4.81% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -10.51% |
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | -4.27% | 16.21% | 24.89% | 27.72% | -7.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than CGUS's -4.27% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CGUS
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 16.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSUS vs. CGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CGUS's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. CGUS — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
CGUS
GSUS vs. CGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.91 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.52 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 6.49 | +0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.91 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.77 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and CGUS is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSUS vs. CGUS - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than CGUS's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 1.14% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% |
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | 1.00% | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. CGUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, which is greater than CGUS's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and CGUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -21.86% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | -11.11% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -6.73% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -4.81% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.59% | +0.01% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. CGUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 5.33%, while Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 5.83% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 9.93% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 17.88% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 16.55% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 16.55% | +0.65% |