GSUI vs. CMDY
GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
GSUI vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUI achieves a -44.62% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 18.91% return.
GSUI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -60.24%
- YTD
- -44.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 18.91%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -44.62% | -42.99% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 18.91% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUI and CMDY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUI vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
GSUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CMDY
GSUI vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUI vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -71.63%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.63% | -31.19% | -40.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.43% | -8.97% | -59.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.04% | -13.10% | -40.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
GSUI vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.20% | 16.53% | +85.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.20% | 15.82% | +86.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.20% | 14.65% | +87.55% |
GSUI vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUI vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.84% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUI and CMDY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.
CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.84%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
GSUI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CMDY is Commodities. GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 0.28% for CMDY.
Find the right allocation for GSUI and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer