GSST vs. SPTU
GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. GSST is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSST charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
GSST vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSST having a 1.55% return and SPTU slightly lower at 1.48%.
GSST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSST vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.55% | 1.00% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSST and SPTU is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSST vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
GSST
SPTU
GSST vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 29.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 185.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.78 | 11.82 | -8.04 |
Drawdowns
GSST vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -0.04% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.00% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
GSST vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSST | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58% | 0.32% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 0.32% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 0.32% | +0.54% |
GSST vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSST vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.32% | 4.56% | 5.45% | 4.98% | 1.97% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 1.66% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSST and SPTU have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for GSST.
GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GSST and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for GSST and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer