PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSC vs. RZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSC vs. RZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 18.15% return.


GSSC

1D
-1.21%
1M
3.24%
YTD
13.55%
6M
13.10%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*

RZG

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
18.15%
6M
16.98%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSC vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
13.55%10.76%11.14%17.27%-16.81%24.13%16.02%23.14%-9.24%8.77%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
18.15%10.22%9.84%19.15%-29.00%21.01%17.76%14.25%-8.70%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSC and RZG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.93

The correlation between GSSC and RZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSSC vs. RZG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSSC
RZG

Industrials

17.7%
18.2%

Financial Services

16.9%
15.0%

Healthcare

16.8%
22.0%

Technology

16.1%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
8.8%

Energy

4.8%
3.0%

Real Estate

4.3%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.9%

Utilities

2.2%
0.4%

Industrials

GSSC
17.7%
RZG
18.2%

Financial Services

GSSC
16.9%
RZG
15.0%

Healthcare

GSSC
16.8%
RZG
22.0%

Technology

GSSC
16.1%
RZG
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GSSC
10.6%
RZG
8.8%

Energy

GSSC
4.8%
RZG
3.0%

Real Estate

GSSC
4.3%
RZG
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

GSSC
4.0%
RZG
5.9%

Basic Materials

GSSC
3.9%
RZG
0.4%

Communication Services

GSSC
2.7%
RZG
1.9%

Utilities

GSSC
2.2%
RZG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSC vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSC
GSSC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

RZG
RZG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSC vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSCRZGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.58

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

11.94

-2.30

GSSC vs. RZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the RZG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSC and RZG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSCRZGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.66

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.21

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.37

+0.07

Drawdowns

GSSC vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and RZG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSCRZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-58.52%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-8.63%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-25.73%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.81%

-38.33%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.92%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-12.13%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.58%

+0.58%

Volatility

GSSC vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) at 4.68%. This indicates that GSSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSCRZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

4.68%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

13.57%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

18.57%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.26%

22.97%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

24.64%

-1.62%

GSSC vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RZG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSC vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison

GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than RZG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
1.07%1.17%1.42%1.33%1.31%1.00%0.94%1.24%1.21%0.73%0.00%0.00%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
0.42%0.37%0.95%1.43%1.59%0.22%0.49%0.70%0.46%0.44%0.65%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GSSC and RZG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSSC has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to RZG (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs RZG's -58.52%.

On 5-year performance, GSSC leads with 7.20% vs 4.85% for RZG. On fees, GSSC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RZG has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSSC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZG.

GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.42% for RZG.

GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while RZG tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.35% for RZG.

RZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSC and RZG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer