GSPY vs. MTUM
GSPY (Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gotham, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. GSPY is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSPY returned 13.71%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSPY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
GSPY vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSPY achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
GSPY
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
GSPY vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF | 11.17% | 18.28% | 23.58% | 26.01% | -17.07% | 27.53% | 0.58% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSPY and MTUM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between GSPY and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSPY vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSPY
MTUM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
GSPY
MTUM
Financial Services
GSPY
MTUM
Communication Services
GSPY
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
GSPY
MTUM
Healthcare
GSPY
MTUM
Industrials
GSPY
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
GSPY
MTUM
Energy
GSPY
MTUM
Real Estate
GSPY
MTUM
Basic Materials
GSPY
MTUM
Utilities
GSPY
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSPY vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
GSPY
MTUM
GSPY vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSPY | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 3.64 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.45 | 14.50 | +0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSPY | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.20 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.74 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.85 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
GSPY vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSPY drawdown since its inception was -23.30%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPY and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSPY | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.30% | -34.08% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -11.54% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.67% | -20.99% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.30% | -32.28% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | 0.00% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -6.21% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.89% | -0.98% |
Volatility
GSPY vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) is 2.81%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that GSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSPY | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 7.68% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 16.46% | -7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 19.04% | -6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 20.60% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 21.03% | -4.71% |
GSPY vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSPY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSPY vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
GSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF | 2.35% | 2.61% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 1.25% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSPY and MTUM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to GSPY (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPY dropped -23.30% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.21% vs 13.71% for GSPY. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GSPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 13.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GSPY.
GSPY has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
GSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GSPY and 0.15% for MTUM.
GSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSPY and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer