GSPY vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSPY (Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gotham, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSPY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

GSPY vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPY achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.

GSPY

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 11.90%
• 1Y: 29.37%
• 3Y*: 22.28%
• 5Y*: 13.71%
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPY vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF	11.17%	13.71%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.45%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPY and BUFH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

GSPY vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPY

GSPY Risk / Return Rank: 72
GSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPY vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSPY	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSPY	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	2.91	-1.96

Drawdowns

GSPY vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPY drawdown since its inception was -23.30%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPY and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSPY	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.30%	-1.53%	-21.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.05%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-0.18%	-4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSPY	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	2.37%	+10.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	2.37%	+14.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.32%	2.37%	+13.95%

GSPY vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSPY vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

GSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF	2.35%	2.61%	0.84%	1.06%	1.25%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSPY and BUFH in my portfolio?

GSPY and BUFH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSPY or BUFH?

On fees, GSPY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSPY or BUFH?

GSPY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSPY or BUFH?

GSPY has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between GSPY and BUFH?

GSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GSPY and 0.95% for BUFH.