PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPKX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPKX achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSPKX having a 13.06% annualized return and GTLOX not far behind at 12.70%.


GSPKX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.77%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.93%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
13.06%

GTLOX

1D
1.39%
1M
9.29%
YTD
22.45%
6M
24.47%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
10.45%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.45%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%-7.97%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPKX and GTLOX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.93

The correlation between GSPKX and GTLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPKX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSPKXGTLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.55

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

5.88

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.67

25.30

-8.63

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPKX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSPKXGTLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

3.17

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.52

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.61

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.50

+0.04

Drawdowns

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPKX drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, roughly equal to the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPKX and GTLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPKXGTLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-54.09%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-7.47%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-32.85%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.34%

-32.85%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-38.15%

+5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-8.33%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.73%

-0.20%

Volatility

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) is 1.99%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that GSPKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPKXGTLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

4.25%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

10.36%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

13.88%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

21.86%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

20.91%

-4.01%

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSPKX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

GSPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than GTLOX's 14.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
5.98%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.62%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSPKX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to GSPKX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPKX dropped -51.90% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPKX and GTLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer