GSMYX vs. WWNPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GSMYX (Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSMYX returned 12.23%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for WWNPX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSMYX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.

Performance

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMYX achieves a 21.31% return, which is significantly higher than WWNPX's 11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GSMYX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.

GSMYX

• 1D: 2.64%
• 1M: 5.89%
• YTD: 21.31%
• 6M: 17.95%
• 1Y: 33.42%
• 3Y*: 13.59%
• 5Y*: 3.30%
• 10Y*: 12.23%

WWNPX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -12.34%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 7.30%
• 1Y: -6.07%
• 3Y*: 27.24%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	21.31%	2.15%	12.88%	14.28%	-28.45%	7.93%	53.14%	38.25%	-5.63%	28.22%
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	11.58%	-14.61%	88.34%	-16.97%	29.18%	38.14%	3.38%	30.47%	-5.24%	28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMYX and WWNPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between GSMYX and WWNPX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GSMYX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSMYX

GSMYX Risk / Return Rank: 42
GSMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GSMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GSMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GSMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GSMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

WWNPX

WWNPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WWNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WWNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WWNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WWNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WWNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSMYX	WWNPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	-0.18	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	-0.02	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.00	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	-0.22	+2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	-0.52	+11.54

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSMYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the WWNPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMYX and WWNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMYX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMYX and WWNPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSMYX	WWNPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.00%	-67.87%	+12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	-27.71%	+15.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.90%	-41.13%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.51%	-41.13%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.51%	-43.51%	+1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-32.37%	+32.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.87%	-13.93%	+3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	11.65%	-8.64%

Volatility

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) is 7.81%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.80%. This indicates that GSMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSMYX	WWNPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.81%	9.80%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.52%	27.20%	-9.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.39%	33.66%	-12.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.83%	33.02%	-9.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.79%	28.69%	-5.90%

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSMYX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison

GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.99%, more than WWNPX's 7.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	12.99%	15.76%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%	14.07%	13.51%	14.27%	20.82%	12.92%	3.50%	3.62%
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	7.36%	8.21%	2.95%	5.65%	2.00%	1.67%	2.15%	1.00%	10.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSMYX and WWNPX in my portfolio?

GSMYX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSMYX or WWNPX?

WWNPX has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to GSMYX (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMYX dropped -55.00% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.