GSMYX vs. VLEQX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GSMYX (Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and VLEQX (Villere Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSMYX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for VLEQX.

Performance

GSMYX vs. VLEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Villere Equity Fund (VLEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSMYX

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: -5.82%
• 6M: 10.39%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 1Y: 22.40%
• 3Y*: 9.73%
• 5Y*: 1.31%
• 10Y*: 11.11%
• ALL TIME*: 10.67%

VLEQX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GSMYX vs. VLEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	13.73%	2.15%	12.88%	14.28%	-28.45%	7.93%	53.14%	38.25%	-5.63%	28.22%
VLEQX Villere Equity Fund	3.58%	0.26%	1.50%	11.37%	-24.50%	5.80%	14.77%	24.50%	-6.98%	7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMYX and VLEQX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between GSMYX and VLEQX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GSMYX vs. VLEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSMYX

GSMYX Risk / Return Rank: 27
GSMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GSMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GSMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GSMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GSMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

VLEQX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSMYX vs. VLEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Villere Equity Fund (VLEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSMYX	VLEQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GSMYX	VLEQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.90%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSMYX	VLEQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.39%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.97%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.82%	—	—

GSMYX vs. VLEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than VLEQX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSMYX vs. VLEQX - Dividend Comparison

GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.86%, more than VLEQX's 13.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSMYX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	13.86%	15.76%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%	14.07%	13.51%	14.27%	20.82%	12.92%	3.50%	3.62%
VLEQX Villere Equity Fund	13.57%	0.54%	0.40%	4.64%	2.88%	8.24%	0.73%	0.17%	0.34%	0.00%	0.11%	1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSMYX and VLEQX in my portfolio?

GSMYX and VLEQX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.