PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWNPX vs. FSHOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) and Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWNPX achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly higher than FSHOX's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, WWNPX has outperformed FSHOX with an annualized return of 18.17%, while FSHOX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.43% annualized return.


WWNPX

1D
-4.32%
1M
-10.76%
YTD
18.58%
6M
17.18%
1Y
-2.03%
3Y*
30.19%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
18.17%

FSHOX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
3.65%
6M
1.87%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm Fund
18.58%-14.61%88.34%-16.97%29.18%38.14%3.38%30.47%-5.24%28.41%
FSHOX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio
3.65%5.24%15.28%30.85%-22.76%57.51%25.95%41.15%-15.87%26.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WWNPX and FSHOX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between WWNPX and FSHOX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWNPX vs. FSHOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWNPX
WWNPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WWNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
WWNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHOX
FSHOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FSHOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHOX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) and Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWNPXFSHOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

0.54

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.14

0.96

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.10

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

0.63

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.59

1.65

-2.24

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWNPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the FSHOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWNPX and FSHOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWNPXFSHOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.54

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.45

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.64

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.56

-0.05

Drawdowns

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWNPX drawdown since its inception was -67.87%, which is greater than FSHOX's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWNPX and FSHOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWNPXFSHOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.87%

-61.68%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.17%

-16.54%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.13%

-24.76%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.13%

-33.23%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-43.67%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.13%

-10.63%

-17.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-9.84%

-4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.43%

6.29%

+5.14%

Volatility

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) at 6.06%. This indicates that WWNPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSHOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWNPXFSHOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

6.06%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.77%

15.68%

+11.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.80%

19.87%

+12.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.84%

21.69%

+11.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.58%

22.49%

+6.09%

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWNPX has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHOX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

WWNPX vs. FSHOX - Dividend Comparison

WWNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than FSHOX's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSHOX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio
6.21%3.91%4.05%0.82%0.80%5.45%4.73%7.91%15.47%13.62%3.61%3.26%
WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm Fund
6.92%8.21%2.95%5.65%2.00%1.67%2.15%1.00%10.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WWNPX and FSHOX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WWNPX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to FSHOX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWNPX dropped -67.87% vs FSHOX's -61.68%.

FSHOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWNPX and FSHOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer