PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSMYX vs. GSSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMYX achieves a 21.31% return, which is significantly higher than GSSRX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GSMYX has outperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.


GSMYX

1D
2.64%
1M
5.89%
YTD
21.31%
6M
17.95%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
12.23%

GSSRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.19%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSMYX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
21.31%2.15%12.88%14.28%-28.45%7.93%53.14%38.25%-5.63%28.22%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
0.72%6.57%4.53%5.28%-6.06%-0.86%5.85%6.79%-0.02%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMYX and GSSRX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.11

The correlation between GSMYX and GSSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSMYX vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSMYX
GSMYX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GSMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GSSRX
GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSMYXGSSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.50

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.90

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

12.69

-1.68

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSMYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the GSSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMYX and GSSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMYX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than GSSRX's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMYX and GSSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSMYXGSSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-9.03%

-45.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-1.62%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.90%

-1.62%

-28.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.51%

-8.88%

-33.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.51%

-9.03%

-33.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-1.26%

-9.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

0.37%

+2.64%

Volatility

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (GSMYX) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) at 0.72%. This indicates that GSMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSMYXGSSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

0.72%

+7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

1.80%

+15.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

2.24%

+19.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

2.43%

+21.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

2.42%

+20.37%

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMYX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSMYX vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison

GSMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.99%, more than GSSRX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSMYX
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
12.99%15.76%0.67%0.00%0.00%14.07%13.51%14.27%20.82%12.92%3.50%3.62%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
4.35%4.18%3.58%2.36%1.59%1.40%2.20%2.87%2.56%2.21%2.04%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSMYX and GSSRX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSMYX has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to GSSRX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMYX dropped -55.00% vs GSSRX's -9.03%.

GSSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSMYX and GSSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer