PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC vs. USSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLC vs. USSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than USSG's 10.39% return.


GSLC

1D
0.14%
1M
4.85%
YTD
9.23%
6M
9.80%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
14.72%

USSG

1D
-0.41%
1M
4.79%
YTD
10.39%
6M
11.42%
1Y
29.67%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
9.23%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%19.01%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
10.39%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and USSG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.97

The correlation between GSLC and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSLC vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSLC
USSG

Technology

38.0%
36.9%

Financial Services

10.6%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
8.6%

Communication Services

10.5%
14.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.6%

Industrials

8.2%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.2%

Energy

3.2%
2.1%

Utilities

2.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.2%

Technology

GSLC
38.0%
USSG
36.9%

Financial Services

GSLC
10.6%
USSG
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSLC
10.6%
USSG
8.6%

Communication Services

GSLC
10.5%
USSG
14.5%

Healthcare

GSLC
8.3%
USSG
9.6%

Industrials

GSLC
8.2%
USSG
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

GSLC
5.5%
USSG
4.2%

Energy

GSLC
3.2%
USSG
2.1%

Utilities

GSLC
2.4%
USSG
1.1%

Basic Materials

GSLC
1.5%
USSG
2.1%

Real Estate

GSLC
1.1%
USSG
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLC vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSLCUSSGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

2.28

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

3.18

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.66

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.04

11.41

+0.62

GSLC vs. USSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the USSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and USSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSLCUSSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.28

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.81

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.85

-0.02

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum USSG drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and USSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLCUSSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-34.10%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-11.20%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-20.00%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-27.00%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-5.60%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.61%

-0.48%

Volatility

GSLC vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is 2.65%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that GSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLCUSSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.74%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

10.01%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

13.09%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.59%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

20.16%

-2.48%

GSLC vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSLC vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than USSG's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.92%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.94%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GSLC and USSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USSG has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to GSLC (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs USSG's -34.10%.

On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 14.22% vs 13.05% for GSLC. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USSG.

USSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.92% for GSLC.

GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.10% for USSG.

USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLC and USSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer