PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC vs. TNBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than TNBIX's 3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GSLC has outperformed TNBIX with an annualized return of 14.64%, while TNBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.58% annualized return.


GSLC

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.52%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.90%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
14.64%

TNBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.26%
YTD
3.71%
6M
4.45%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
8.50%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%30.74%-4.07%22.49%
TNBIX
1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund
3.71%13.93%16.70%16.79%-14.43%22.84%11.09%26.66%-5.66%19.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and TNBIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015

0.92

The correlation between GSLC and TNBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLC vs. TNBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

TNBIX
TNBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TNBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TNBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSLCTNBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

1.29

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

1.88

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.48

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.96

6.55

+4.41

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the TNBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and TNBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSLCTNBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.29

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.68

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.72

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.64

+0.18

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, which is greater than TNBIX's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and TNBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLCTNBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-30.11%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-7.76%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-12.07%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-23.13%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-30.11%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.66%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-3.97%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.75%

+0.38%

Volatility

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund (TNBIX) at 2.08%. This indicates that GSLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLCTNBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.08%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.84%

6.86%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

8.90%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

13.23%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

14.79%

+2.89%

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TNBIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSLC vs. TNBIX - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than TNBIX's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
TNBIX
1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund
4.62%4.80%4.47%1.44%1.08%7.47%1.31%2.27%5.45%1.59%1.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSLC and TNBIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSLC has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to TNBIX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs TNBIX's -30.11%.

GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLC and TNBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer