PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC vs. JPME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLC vs. JPME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than JPME's 18.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GSLC has outperformed JPME with an annualized return of 14.48%, while JPME has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.


GSLC

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.91%
6M
11.66%
YTD
11.56%
1Y
20.26%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.48%
ALL TIME*
14.29%

JPME

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.21%
6M
10.87%
YTD
18.10%
1Y
24.05%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
11.03%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.07M$49.12M$41.41M
$942.66K$1.55M$1.44M

GSLC vs. JPME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
11.56%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%30.74%-4.07%22.49%
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
18.10%8.26%13.55%11.28%-10.12%28.90%8.46%25.87%-8.92%19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and JPME is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016

0.83

The correlation between GSLC and JPME shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSLC vs. JPME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSLC
JPME

Technology

37.8%
9.2%

Financial Services

10.9%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
8.6%

Communication Services

10.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

9.1%
11.7%

Industrials

8.5%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
9.9%

Energy

2.9%
7.6%

Utilities

2.2%
10.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
7.8%

Real Estate

1.2%
11.6%

Technology

GSLC
37.8%
JPME
9.2%

Financial Services

GSLC
10.9%
JPME
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GSLC
10.3%
JPME
8.6%

Communication Services

GSLC
10.2%
JPME
3.5%

Healthcare

GSLC
9.1%
JPME
11.7%

Industrials

GSLC
8.5%
JPME
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSLC
5.5%
JPME
9.9%

Energy

GSLC
2.9%
JPME
7.6%

Utilities

GSLC
2.2%
JPME
10.1%

Basic Materials

GSLC
1.4%
JPME
7.8%

Real Estate

GSLC
1.2%
JPME
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLC vs. JPME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

JPME
JPME Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSLC vs. JPME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSLCJPMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.53

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

13.54

-4.49

GSLC vs. JPME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the JPME Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and JPME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. JPME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum JPME drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and JPME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLCJPMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-41.01%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-6.84%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-18.70%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-19.30%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-41.01%

+7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.44%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-4.32%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.78%

+0.46%

Volatility

GSLC vs. JPME - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) at 2.88%. This indicates that GSLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLCJPMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

2.88%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

8.58%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

11.82%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

16.08%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

17.64%

+0.06%

GSLC vs. JPME - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than JPME's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSLC vs. JPME - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than JPME's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.91%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.72%2.03%1.77%1.84%1.84%1.44%1.51%1.68%1.80%1.17%0.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSLC and JPME have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSLC has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to JPME (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs JPME's -41.01%.

On 10-year performance, GSLC leads with 14.48% vs 11.03% for JPME. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSLC has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPME.

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.91% for GSLC.

GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JPME is Mid Cap Blend Equities. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.24% for JPME.

JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLC and JPME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer