GSLC vs. JPME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while JPME is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSLC returned 14.64%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for JPME. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSLC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPME.

Performance

GSLC vs. JPME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than JPME's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GSLC has outperformed JPME with an annualized return of 14.64%, while JPME has yielded a comparatively lower 11.01% annualized return.

GSLC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 6M: 8.90%
• 1Y: 23.28%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 12.70%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

JPME

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 13.42%
• 6M: 13.47%
• 1Y: 22.44%
• 3Y*: 15.41%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC vs. JPME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	8.50%	16.17%	24.21%	25.09%	-18.71%	27.17%	19.02%	30.74%	-4.07%	22.49%
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF	13.42%	8.26%	13.55%	11.28%	-10.12%	28.90%	8.46%	25.87%	-8.92%	19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and JPME is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016	0.83

The correlation between GSLC and JPME shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSLC vs. JPME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSLC	JPME
Technology	38.0%	12.0%
Financial Services	10.6%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	8.8%
Communication Services	10.5%	3.6%
Healthcare	8.3%	10.7%
Industrials	8.2%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	9.6%
Energy	3.2%	7.8%
Utilities	2.4%	9.4%
Basic Materials	1.5%	7.0%
Real Estate	1.1%	11.5%

Return for Risk

GSLC vs. JPME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC

GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 56
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

JPME

JPME Risk / Return Rank: 59
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC vs. JPME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSLC	JPME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.87	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.72	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	3.30	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.96	12.25	-1.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSLC vs. JPME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the JPME Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and JPME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSLC	JPME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.87	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.54	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.62	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.64	+0.18

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. JPME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum JPME drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and JPME.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSLC	JPME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.69%	-41.01%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.49%	-6.84%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.66%	-18.70%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.90%	-19.30%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.69%	-41.01%	+7.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-4.39%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.84%	+0.29%

Volatility

GSLC vs. JPME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is 2.74%, while JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that GSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSLC	JPME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	3.43%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	8.48%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.72%	12.05%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.62%	16.15%	+0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	17.70%	-0.02%

GSLC vs. JPME - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than JPME's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSLC vs. JPME - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than JPME's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.93%	1.00%	1.11%	1.38%	1.61%	1.06%	1.35%	1.54%	1.89%	1.69%	1.69%	0.36%
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.82%	2.03%	1.77%	1.84%	1.84%	1.44%	1.51%	1.68%	1.80%	1.17%	0.91%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSLC and JPME in my portfolio?

GSLC and JPME have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSLC or JPME?

JPME has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to GSLC (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs JPME's -41.01%.

Which ETF is better, GSLC or JPME?

On 10-year performance, GSLC leads with 14.64% vs 11.01% for JPME. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSLC or JPME?

Over the 10-year period, GSLC has performed better with a 14.64% return vs 11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSLC or JPME?

GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSLC or JPME?

JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.93% for GSLC.

What is the main difference between GSLC and JPME?

GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while JPME is Mid Cap Blend Equities. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.24% for JPME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.