PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. JPXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. JPXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than JPXN's 15.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSJY having a 9.28% annualized return and JPXN not far behind at 9.18%.


GSJY

1D
0.75%
1M
4.99%
YTD
13.29%
6M
15.13%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
9.28%

JPXN

1D
0.13%
1M
5.12%
YTD
15.72%
6M
17.28%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
9.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. JPXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
13.29%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
15.72%26.03%6.48%19.69%-16.29%0.16%15.12%19.40%-14.87%24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and JPXN is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016

0.94

The correlation between GSJY and JPXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSJY vs. JPXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSJY
JPXN

Industrials

26.3%
28.3%

Financial Services

18.1%
13.7%

Technology

17.5%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
11.3%

Communication Services

6.0%
7.8%

Healthcare

5.8%
6.2%

Energy

3.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

3.4%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.6%

Industrials

GSJY
26.3%
JPXN
28.3%

Financial Services

GSJY
18.1%
JPXN
13.7%

Technology

GSJY
17.5%
JPXN
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GSJY
13.4%
JPXN
11.3%

Communication Services

GSJY
6.0%
JPXN
7.8%

Healthcare

GSJY
5.8%
JPXN
6.2%

Energy

GSJY
3.4%
JPXN
1.4%

Basic Materials

GSJY
3.4%
JPXN
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

GSJY
3.3%
JPXN
4.8%

Real Estate

GSJY
1.5%
JPXN
2.8%

Utilities

GSJY
1.4%
JPXN
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. JPXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

JPXN
JPXN Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. JPXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSJYJPXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.34

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

8.14

-1.05

GSJY vs. JPXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the JPXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and JPXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSJYJPXNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.63

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.49

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.54

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.27

+0.28

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. JPXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum JPXN drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and JPXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYJPXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-55.54%

+23.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-13.11%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-13.95%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-33.21%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-33.21%

+0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.93%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-15.06%

+7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

3.76%

+0.45%

Volatility

GSJY vs. JPXN - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYJPXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.31%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

14.69%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

18.79%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

17.70%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.06%

-0.02%

GSJY vs. JPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JPXN's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSJY vs. JPXN - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than JPXN's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
1.75%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%0.00%
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
2.72%3.14%2.29%2.57%1.47%2.63%1.27%1.92%1.60%1.50%2.07%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GSJY and JPXN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JPXN has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to GSJY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs JPXN's -55.54%.

On 10-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.28% vs 9.18% for JPXN. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for JPXN.

JPXN has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.

GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while JPXN tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.48% for JPXN.

JPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and JPXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer