GSIHX vs. RWIIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GSIHX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A) and RWIIX (Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GSIHX returned 8.18%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for RWIIX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSIHX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for RWIIX.

Performance

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIHX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than RWIIX's 7.48% return.

GSIHX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: 3.45%
• 6M: 3.55%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: 15.16%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —

RWIIX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.50%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 20.25%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 1.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSIHX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A	3.45%	20.43%	9.35%	21.60%	-11.36%	12.01%	15.36%	27.15%	-6.38%	0.46%
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund	7.48%	7.87%	-6.03%	9.07%	-11.57%	10.68%	14.57%	4.58%	-2.46%	0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIHX and RWIIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017	0.49

The correlation between GSIHX and RWIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSIHX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIHX

GSIHX Risk / Return Rank: 15
GSIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
GSIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GSIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
GSIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
GSIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

RWIIX

RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 46
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSIHX	RWIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.77	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.44	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.34	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.93	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	7.65	-3.73

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIHX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIHX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIHX and RWIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIHX	RWIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.79%	-20.34%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	-6.94%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.42%	-20.34%	+9.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.63%	-20.34%	-5.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.37%	-2.38%	-3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-7.78%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.65%	-0.08%

Volatility

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) is 2.86%, while Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that GSIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSIHX	RWIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	4.12%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	9.08%	-0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.93%	11.52%	-1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.40%	11.63%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	10.95%	+4.74%

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIHX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSIHX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

GSIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than RWIIX's 8.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSIHX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A	4.64%	4.80%	10.87%	2.04%	4.47%	1.90%	0.00%	0.41%	0.18%	0.00%
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund	8.13%	8.74%	0.00%	6.82%	1.72%	14.15%	6.51%	1.84%	0.86%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSIHX and RWIIX in my portfolio?

GSIHX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSIHX or RWIIX?

RWIIX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to GSIHX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIHX dropped -28.79% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.