GSIHX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
GSIHX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Performance
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIHX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A | 3.72% | 20.43% | 9.35% | 21.60% | -11.36% | 12.01% | 15.36% | 27.15% | -6.38% | 29.41% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIHX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return.
GSIHX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIHX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSIHX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
GSIHX
FNDF
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIHX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 2.31 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 3.02 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.46 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.52 | -1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 13.78 | -6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIHX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.31 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.78 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.49 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIHX and FNDF is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
GSIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FNDF's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIHX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A | 4.63% | 4.80% | 10.87% | 2.04% | 4.47% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIHX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIHX and FNDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIHX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -40.14% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -11.08% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.63% | -25.56% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -7.26% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -7.72% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.83% | -0.66% |
Volatility
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) is 4.82%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that GSIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSIHX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 8.06% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.37% | 11.42% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 17.50% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 16.05% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 17.64% | -1.85% |