Correlation
The correlation between GSIHX and FNDF is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
GSIHX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
GSIHX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSIHX or FNDF.
Performance
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GSIHX:
0.20
FNDF:
0.82
GSIHX:
0.25
FNDF:
1.12
GSIHX:
1.04
FNDF:
1.15
GSIHX:
0.12
FNDF:
0.89
GSIHX:
0.27
FNDF:
2.64
GSIHX:
6.56%
FNDF:
4.68%
GSIHX:
16.03%
FNDF:
17.16%
GSIHX:
-28.79%
FNDF:
-40.14%
GSIHX:
-1.47%
FNDF:
-0.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIHX achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 17.49% return.
GSIHX
13.23%
2.81%
8.92%
3.14%
9.55%
11.14%
N/A
FNDF
17.49%
4.30%
14.75%
13.88%
10.80%
14.67%
6.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIHX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSIHX vs. FNDF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSIHX
FNDF
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
GSIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than FNDF's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIHX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A | 5.65% | 6.40% | 2.04% | 4.46% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.41% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIHX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIHX and FNDF.
Loading data...
Volatility
GSIHX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) at 2.87%. This indicates that GSIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...