PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWIIX vs. RWDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) and Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIIX achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than RWDIX's 1.15% return.


RWIIX

1D
0.43%
1M
2.25%
6M
3.15%
YTD
8.40%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.81%

RWDIX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.27%
6M
0.70%
YTD
1.15%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
1.42%
ALL TIME*
1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.40%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%
RWDIX
Redwood Managed Volatility Fund
1.15%4.75%6.63%1.04%-11.18%0.52%-1.93%9.04%-2.60%0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIIX and RWDIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017

0.44

The correlation between RWIIX and RWDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWIIX vs. RWDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

RWDIX
RWDIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RWDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RWDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) and Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWIIXRWDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.16

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

9.80

-3.09

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the RWDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIIX and RWDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIIX drawdown since its inception was -20.34%, which is greater than RWDIX's maximum drawdown of -16.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIIX and RWDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWIIXRWDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.34%

-16.69%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-1.95%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.34%

-4.72%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.34%

-16.10%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-0.63%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-4.37%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

0.43%

+2.43%

Volatility

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Volatility Comparison

Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) at 0.65%. This indicates that RWIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWIIXRWDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

0.65%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

1.85%

+7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

2.24%

+9.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.70%

4.69%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.98%

4.24%

+6.74%

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIIX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than RWDIX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWIIX vs. RWDIX - Dividend Comparison

RWIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than RWDIX's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWDIX
Redwood Managed Volatility Fund
5.13%4.90%5.82%7.60%0.47%6.36%5.42%3.59%2.59%5.52%5.14%1.17%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.06%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWIIX and RWDIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWIIX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to RWDIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIIX dropped -20.34% vs RWDIX's -16.69%.

RWDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWIIX and RWDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer