PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIG vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIG vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.72% return.


GSIG

1D
0.01%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.91%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*

VCSH

1D
0.10%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
0.68%6.69%4.72%6.06%-5.80%-0.81%1.59%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.72%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and VCSH is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.96

The correlation between GSIG and VCSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIG vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG
GSIG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIGVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.42

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.93

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

11.86

+0.91

GSIG vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIG and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIGVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-12.86%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-1.40%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-1.40%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-9.48%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.24%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-0.96%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.35%

+0.01%

Volatility

GSIG vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) is 0.57%, while Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that GSIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIGVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.69%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

1.48%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.92%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.89%

2.89%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

3.35%

-0.64%

GSIG vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIG vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than VCSH's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
4.34%4.61%4.59%3.51%2.21%1.04%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIG and VCSH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCSH has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to GSIG (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIG dropped -9.57% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 5-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.37% vs 2.18% for GSIG. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GSIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.37% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.

VCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.34% for GSIG.

GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while VCSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.04% for VCSH.

GSIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIG and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer