GSIG vs. VCLT
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - GSIG tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index while VCLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
GSIG vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.99%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
GSIG vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -1.10% | 7.18% | -1.90% | 11.17% | -25.50% | -1.73% | 4.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and VCLT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between GSIG and VCLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VCLT
GSIG vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -16.12% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.19% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
GSIG vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.78% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 12.77% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.84% | — |
GSIG vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIG vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than VCLT's 5.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.00% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.69% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and VCLT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 4.00% for GSIG.
GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.03% for VCLT.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer