GSIG vs. IBHF
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and IBHF (iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. GSIG is passively managed, while IBHF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSIG returned 2.18%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for IBHF. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHF.
Performance
GSIG vs. IBHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than IBHF's 0.63% return.
GSIG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 7.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIG vs. IBHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 0.88% |
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 0.63% | 6.60% | 8.55% | 10.40% | -6.66% | 4.43% | 2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and IBHF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2020 | 0.47 |
The correlation between GSIG and IBHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. IBHF — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
IBHF
GSIG vs. IBHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIG | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.46 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 5.53 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | 17.58 | -4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. IBHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum IBHF drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and IBHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -11.19% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | -0.75% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.46% | -2.53% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -11.19% | +1.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.36% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -1.78% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 0.24% | +0.12% |
Volatility
GSIG vs. IBHF - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) at 0.47%. This indicates that GSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 0.47% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | 1.22% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84% | 1.91% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 5.79% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 5.63% | -2.92% |
GSIG vs. IBHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSIG vs. IBHF - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than IBHF's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.53% | 6.73% | 7.17% | 7.33% | 6.01% | 4.55% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and IBHF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIG has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to IBHF (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIG dropped -9.57% vs IBHF's -11.19%.
On 5-year performance, IBHF leads with 3.95% vs 2.18% for GSIG. On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, IBHF has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBHF has performed better with a 3.95% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHF.
IBHF has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 4.34% for GSIG.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.35% for IBHF.
GSIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and IBHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer