FCSH vs. TLT
FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCSH is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Federated, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. FCSH is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCSH returned 5.01%/yr vs -1.80%/yr for TLT. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCSH charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
FCSH vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSH achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.49% return.
FCSH
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.32%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.04K | $21.66K | $33.56K | |
| $2.33B | $2.02B | $2.19B |
FCSH vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 0.48% | 6.42% | 4.66% | 5.45% | -5.87% | 0.08% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -3.49% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSH and TLT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FCSH and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCSH vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
FCSH
TLT
FCSH vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCSH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.99 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | -0.14 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | -0.30 | +7.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCSH vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSH drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSH and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -48.35% | +39.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | -7.74% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.32% | -14.79% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -42.36% | +41.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -13.99% | +11.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 3.57% | -3.15% |
Volatility
FCSH vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) is 0.49%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that FCSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCSH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 2.46% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | 6.85% | -5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98% | 9.32% | -7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 15.74% | -12.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 14.83% | -11.96% |
FCSH vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSH has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCSH vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
FCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than TLT's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 4.24% | 4.14% | 4.44% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCSH and TLT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to FCSH (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSH dropped -8.47% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 3-year performance, FCSH leads with 5.01% vs -1.80% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FCSH has performed better with a 5.01% return vs -1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FCSH.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.24% for FCSH.
FCSH is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while TLT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Federated and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FCSH and 0.15% for TLT.
FCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCSH and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer