PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIG vs. BSCQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSIG

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSCQ

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.86%
YTD
1.88%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
0.68%6.69%4.72%6.06%-5.80%-0.81%1.59%
BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
1.88%5.02%4.86%5.71%-8.31%-1.68%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and BSCQ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between GSIG and BSCQ has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIG vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BSCQ
BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIGBSCQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

41.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

182.17

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIGBSCQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

Volatility

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIGBSCQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIG vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than BSCQ's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
4.10%4.14%4.05%3.53%2.54%1.91%2.42%2.96%3.32%2.92%0.51%
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
4.00%4.61%4.59%3.51%2.21%1.04%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIG and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.

BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 4.00% for GSIG.

GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.10% for BSCQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIG and BSCQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer