GSIG vs. BSCQ
GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - GSIG tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index while BSCQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
GSIG vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSIG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIG vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 6.69% | 4.72% | 6.06% | -5.80% | -0.81% | 1.59% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.88% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIG and BSCQ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GSIG and BSCQ has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIG vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
GSIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCQ
GSIG vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 41.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 182.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIG vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.05% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.82% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
GSIG vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 4.74% | — |
GSIG vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIG vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than BSCQ's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.10% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.00% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIG and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSIG.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 4.00% for GSIG.
GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.10% for BSCQ.
Find the right allocation for GSIG and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer