GSIB vs. TFNS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS).

GSIB and TFNS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. TFNS is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 11, 2025.

Performance

GSIB vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GSIB vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	-3.15%	27.52%
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	-8.68%	10.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly higher than TFNS's -8.68% return.

GSIB

• 1D: 4.01%
• 1M: -4.96%
• YTD: -3.15%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 36.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TFNS

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: -3.39%
• YTD: -8.68%
• 6M: -5.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIB vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.

TFNS

T. Rowe Price Financials ETF

GSIB

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF

Return for Risk

GSIB vs. TFNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 86
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIB vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSIB	TFNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSIB	TFNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.15	0.07	+2.08

Correlation

The correlation between GSIB and TFNS is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GSIB vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison

GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than TFNS's 0.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.97%	1.91%	1.67%
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	0.54%	0.49%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GSIB vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and TFNS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSIB	TFNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.71%	-14.00%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.87%	-11.23%	+1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-3.10%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSIB	TFNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.79%	15.50%	+5.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.39%	15.50%	+2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.39%	15.50%	+2.89%