TFNS vs. PBDC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) and PBDC (Putnam BDC Income ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TFNS charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PBDC.

Performance

TFNS vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -9.74% return.

TFNS

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: -5.36%
• 6M: -2.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBDC

• 1D: -2.15%
• 1M: -6.53%
• YTD: -9.74%
• 6M: -10.38%
• 1Y: -10.30%
• 3Y*: 7.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFNS vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	-5.36%	10.41%
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	-9.74%	-1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TFNS and PBDC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.50

TFNS vs. PBDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TFNS	PBDC
Financial Services	97.1%	100.0%
Technology	1.9%	-
Industrials	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TFNS vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDC

PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 4
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFNS vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFNS	PBDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.73	-0.42

Drawdowns

TFNS vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum PBDC drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and PBDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFNS	PBDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.00%	-20.47%	+6.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.00%	-17.21%	+9.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-4.66%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFNS	PBDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.04%	18.31%	-3.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.04%	17.04%	-2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.04%	17.04%	-2.00%

TFNS vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFNS vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison

TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than PBDC's 11.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	11.69%	10.53%	9.29%	9.86%	3.40%
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	0.52%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFNS and PBDC in my portfolio?

TFNS and PBDC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TFNS or PBDC?

On fees, TFNS is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFNS or PBDC?

TFNS is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFNS or PBDC?

PBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.69%, compared with 0.52% for TFNS.

What is the main difference between TFNS and PBDC?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.75% for PBDC.