GSIB vs. DFEN
GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) and DFEN (Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes, while DFEN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index (300%). GSIB is actively managed, while DFEN is passively managed. Over the past year, GSIB returned 47.83% vs 75.01% for DFEN. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSIB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DFEN.
Performance
GSIB vs. DFEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly higher than DFEN's 13.12% return.
GSIB
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 9.77%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 75.01%
- 3Y*
- 64.38%
- 5Y*
- 29.22%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIB vs. DFEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 13.98% | 61.67% | 32.86% | 1.75% |
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 13.12% | 156.62% | 27.07% | 4.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIB and DFEN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023 | 0.46 |
GSIB vs. DFEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSIB
DFEN
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
GSIB
DFEN
-
Basic Materials
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Communication Services
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Consumer Cyclical
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Consumer Defensive
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Energy
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Healthcare
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Industrials
GSIB
-
DFEN
Real Estate
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Technology
GSIB
-
DFEN
Utilities
GSIB
-
DFEN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIB vs. DFEN — Risk / Return Rank
GSIB
DFEN
GSIB vs. DFEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIB | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.85 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 4.29 | +7.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIB vs. DFEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum DFEN drawdown of -91.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and DFEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIB | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -91.36% | +73.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -41.75% | +27.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -25.87% | +25.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -45.20% | +43.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 17.99% | -14.05% |
Volatility
GSIB vs. DFEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) is 5.59%, while Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) has a volatility of 27.31%. This indicates that GSIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIB | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 27.31% | -21.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.41% | 55.81% | -41.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 65.81% | -48.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 60.74% | -42.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 71.66% | -53.15% |
GSIB vs. DFEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEN's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSIB vs. DFEN - Dividend Comparison
GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than DFEN's 7.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 7.89% | 8.89% | 14.12% | 1.13% | 0.46% | 1.89% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 1.07% | 1.50% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.67% | 1.91% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIB and DFEN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEN has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to GSIB (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIB dropped -17.71% vs DFEN's -91.36%.
On 1-year performance, DFEN leads with 75.01% vs 47.83% for GSIB. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFEN has performed better with a 75.01% return vs 47.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DFEN.
DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 1.67% for GSIB.
GSIB is categorized as Financials Equities, while DFEN is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GSIB and 0.99% for DFEN.
GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIB and DFEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer