GSGO vs. VV
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index. GSGO is actively managed, while VV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
GSGO vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 9.78% return.
GSGO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $292.33K | $361.30K | $297.31K | |
| $85.99M | $75.21M | $96.89M |
GSGO vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 6.78% | 0.81% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 9.78% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and VV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VV
GSGO vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSGO | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -54.81% | +40.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -1.53% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -6.80% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 13.01% | +6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 17.35% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 18.21% | +1.48% |
GSGO vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GSGO and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GSGO.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.
GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.04% for VV.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer