GSGO vs. GBIL
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. GSGO is actively managed, while GBIL is passively managed. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
GSGO vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 1.99% return.
GSGO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.17M | $51.25M | $70.01M | |
| $292.33K | $361.30K | $297.31K |
GSGO vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 6.78% | 0.81% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 1.99% | 0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and GBIL is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GBIL
GSGO vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSGO | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 95.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 192.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2,308.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -0.76% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | 0.00% | -5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -0.04% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 0.22% | +19.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 0.58% | +19.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 0.47% | +19.22% |
GSGO vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.36% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSGO and GBIL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GSGO.
GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.
GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.12% for GBIL.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer