PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGO vs. GARY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGO vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 25.28% return.


GSGO

1D
-3.46%
1M
2.75%
YTD
8.99%
6M
7.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GARY

1D
-4.30%
1M
3.59%
YTD
25.28%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGO vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
8.99%-0.62%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
25.28%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGO and GARY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGO vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GSGO vs. GARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGOGARYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

3.28

-2.19

Drawdowns

GSGO vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and GARY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGOGARYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-10.28%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.79%

-4.86%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.94%

-1.70%

-1.24%

Volatility

GSGO vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGOGARYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

20.25%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

20.25%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

20.25%

-1.79%

GSGO vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGO vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


PositionTTM2025
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGO and GARY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.77% for GARY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGO and GARY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer