PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGO vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGO vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 24.94% return.


GSGO

1D
-3.46%
1M
2.75%
YTD
8.99%
6M
7.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DARP

1D
-5.45%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
24.94%
6M
24.74%
1Y
71.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGO vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
8.99%1.36%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
24.94%5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGO and DARP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGO vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGO

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGO vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GSGO vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGODARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.36

-0.26

Drawdowns

GSGO vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGODARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-30.27%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.79%

-6.54%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.94%

-4.64%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

Volatility

GSGO vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGODARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

23.83%

-5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

26.29%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

26.29%

-7.83%

GSGO vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGO vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.35%0.43%1.93%0.32%
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGO and DARP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.75% for DARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGO and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer