GSG vs. VWO
GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSG returned 6.69%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for VWO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
GSG vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 26.84% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, GSG has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 6.69%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.
GSG
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -12.03%
- YTD
- 26.84%
- 6M
- 26.40%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
GSG vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 26.84% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 3.89% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 14.05% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and VWO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2006 | 0.36 |
The correlation between GSG and VWO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
VWO
GSG vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.89 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 10.19 | -3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSG vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than VWO's maximum drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -67.68% | -21.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.88% | -11.17% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -17.37% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -32.60% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | -36.39% | -21.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.70% | 0.00% | -61.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -15.79% | -47.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 3.16% | +1.30% |
Volatility
GSG vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) is 5.46%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that GSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 6.57% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 14.28% | +6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.19% | 16.67% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 17.53% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 19.24% | +2.79% |
GSG vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSG vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.26% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSG and VWO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to GSG (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSG dropped -89.62% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 9.31% vs 6.69% for GSG. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
GSG is categorized as Commodities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSG and 0.08% for VWO.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSG and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer