PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEU vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEU vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEU achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's 0.44% return.


GSEU

1D
-1.00%
1M
2.97%
YTD
5.62%
6M
9.09%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
9.21%

FLGR

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.04%
YTD
0.44%
6M
4.14%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEU vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
5.62%35.70%2.00%20.74%-17.90%17.33%6.64%24.57%-14.29%1.22%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.44%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEU and FLGR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.87

The correlation between GSEU and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEU vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEU
FLGR

Financial Services

24.7%
21.7%

Industrials

19.9%
30.5%

Healthcare

13.1%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
1.4%

Technology

8.1%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
8.2%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.9%

Utilities

4.8%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.6%
6.3%

Energy

4.4%

-

Real Estate

0.6%
1.3%

Financial Services

GSEU
24.7%
FLGR
21.7%

Industrials

GSEU
19.9%
FLGR
30.5%

Healthcare

GSEU
13.1%
FLGR
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

GSEU
8.4%
FLGR
1.4%

Technology

GSEU
8.1%
FLGR
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEU
6.6%
FLGR
8.2%

Basic Materials

GSEU
5.0%
FLGR
5.9%

Utilities

GSEU
4.8%
FLGR
5.0%

Communication Services

GSEU
4.6%
FLGR
6.3%

Energy

GSEU
4.4%
FLGR

-

Real Estate

GSEU
0.6%
FLGR
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEU vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEU
GSEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GSEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEU vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEUFLGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.05

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

0.22

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

0.63

+4.90

GSEU vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEU and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEUFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.19

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.32

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.28

+0.25

Drawdowns

GSEU vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, smaller than the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and FLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEUFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.71%

-46.21%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-14.44%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-15.53%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.98%

-43.54%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-4.26%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-12.37%

+5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

5.03%

-1.87%

Volatility

GSEU vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) is 5.58%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that GSEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEUFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

6.23%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

14.03%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

17.18%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

20.26%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

21.43%

-3.32%

GSEU vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSEU vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than FLGR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.71%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
2.58%2.72%2.35%3.41%3.34%2.71%1.84%3.69%3.40%2.51%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEU and FLGR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to GSEU (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEU dropped -35.71% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

On 5-year performance, GSEU leads with 8.08% vs 6.45% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSEU has performed better with a 8.08% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSEU.

GSEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.71% for FLGR.

GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSEU and 0.09% for FLGR.

GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEU and FLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer