PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEP vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEP vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEP achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.


GSEP

1D
0.17%
1M
1.25%
6M
5.43%
YTD
6.32%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.71%
6M
17.92%
YTD
18.52%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEP vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GSEP and RSBY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEP vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEP
GSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEP vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEPRSBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.15

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

5.04

+8.25

GSEP vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEP and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEP vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEP drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEP and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEPRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-23.32%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-7.95%

+3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.45%

+6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-13.35%

+12.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

3.39%

-2.51%

Volatility

GSEP vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) is 1.61%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that GSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEPRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

3.15%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

8.37%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98%

11.41%

-5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.52%

13.37%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.52%

13.37%

-5.85%

GSEP vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEP vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

GSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GSEP and RSBY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSBY has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to GSEP (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEP dropped -10.09% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs 11.87% for GSEP. On fees, GSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for GSEP.

GSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GSEP and 0.98% for RSBY.

GSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEP and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer